American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 275-302 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X8201000301

Social Stratification, Nondecision-Making, and the Study of Community Power

Clarence N. Stone

University of Maryland

The nondecision process can best be studied by viewing power as having a strategic dimension and as operating at three levels. A nonpluralist approach treats the public and private sectors as highly interdependent and assumes that a wide range of social resources and community activities are politically relevant, though not always manifestly so. Given that social resources are unequally distributed among different social strata, we have good cause to consider how behavior in the power arena might be affected by the distribution of resources and the structure of the situation. We can hypothesize that the scope and extent of efforts made by various strata are influenced by the amounts of resources possessed, opportunity costs, likelihoods of success, and immediacy of costs and benefits at stake. Thus, while those who are disadvantaged might in the abstract be motivated to work for system change, we can see that their concrete circumstances could dictate otherwise. We can therefore hypothesize further that imbalances in social resources contribute to sets of arrangements through which those imbalances are protected rather than challenged politically. These arrangements can be categorized and analyzed as elements in a nondecision process.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?