This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) Order Full text via Infotrieve Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Fridkin, K. L. Articles by Kenney, P. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Dimensions of Negative Messages

Arizona State University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Fridkin{at}asu.edu.

	Abstract

Candidates and campaign strategists believe that negative campaigning works—negative messages depress citizen’s evaluations of targeted candidates. However, scholars have been unable to validate consistently the claims of practitioners. To better understand how negative campaigning influences the electorate, it is necessary to consider the relevance and civility of negative messages. In particular, do citizens make distinctions concerning the relevance and civility of campaign messages? If so, do citizens’ views about the relevance and civility of negative messages influence how they evaluate candidates? We rely on an experimental research design embedded in a public opinion survey to examine people’s reactions to negative commercials. Based on a national survey of nearly 700 respondents, we find citizens differentiate between negative advertisements in meaningful and consistent ways. Furthermore, the civility and relevance of the negative commercials significantly influences people’s evaluations of the targeted candidates in several ways, including trait, affect, and issue evaluations.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?