This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, J. E. Articles by Wink, K. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Trial-Heat Forecasts of the Presidential Vote

Louisiana State University

Kenneth A. Wink

Louisiana State University

This research examines Gallup poll trial-heat forecasts of the two-party presidential popular vote for the incumbent presidential party. First, several existing forecasting equations are updated and evaluated. Trial-heat results at six points throughout campaigns from 1948 to 1988 are then examined. These trial-heats are used in several ways to produce presidential vote forecasts: (a) in raw form as direct forecasts, (b) alone in regression estimated forecasts, and (c) in conjunction with economic growth in regression estimated forecasts. As Lewis-Beck and Rice found in 1985, the earliest and most accurate trial-heat forecasts are those using early September trial-heats and second-quarter real growth in the gross national product. These forecasts are also more accurate than forecasts based on previous models. The early September trial-heat/economy forecast equation has an average "within-sample" error of only ±1 percentage point (adjusted R² = .94, SEE = 1.5) and a mean "out-of-sample" error of ±1.1 percentage points. The early September trial-heat/economy equation correctly "predicted" the winning presidential candidate in ten of the eleven elections from 1948 to 1988, missing only in the near dead heat of 1960.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?