American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumer, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gold, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 33-61 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9502300102

Party Images and the American Electorate

Donald C. Baumer

Smith College

Howard J. Gold

Smith College

This article investigates the presence of widely recognized images of the two major political parties, using the Center for Political Studies' (CPS) open-ended questions on party likes and dislikes. The authors find that a very substantial portion of the CPS samples (from 1976 to 1992) can articulate substantive images of the parties, and that the content of these images is both specific and enduring. Democrats are seen as the party of inclusion and government spending, whereas Republicans are viewed as allies of the wealthy and opponents of government spending and intervention. The images change at the margins as major political events and experiences sink into the public consciousness. Multivariate analysis allows the authors to identify with some precision those who hold what they call dominant images of the parties and those who do not. In general, people who are strongly partisan, well educated, and follow politics are highly likely to view the parties in the way the authors have postulated. Roughly two thirds of likely voters articulate dominant images of the parties. The authors' findings help to clarify what the "running scorecard" concept of partisan affiliation means to most voters in the contemporary period. Party images provide a widely recognized and well-understood framework for evaluating candidates and parties.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?