This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Baum, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Measuring Policy Change in the Rehnquist Court

Ohio State University

Measurement of policy change is complicated by change in the content of the issues that policymakers face. The author presented a method to control for issue change in decisions of the Supreme Court and used that method to measure change in civil liberties policy from 1946 to 1986. This article uses the same method to measure policy change in the early Rehnquist Court (1986-1993). The analysis indicates that the early Rehnquist Court was less favorable to civil liberties than its record of pro- and anti-civil liberties decisions indicates, because it increasingly accepted cases in which pro-civil liberties votes were relatively "easy" to cast. The results underline the need to take issue change into account in analyzing policy change.

American Politics Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, 373-382 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9502300307


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?