American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Southwell, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 221-236 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9602400205

Economic Salience and Differential Abstention in Presidential Elections

Priscilla L. Southwell

University of Oregon

Previous studies of American voting behavior have assumed that variations in turnout across election years are the result of fluctuations in the determinants of the voting decision. In this article I suggest that levels of turnout may also vary from year to year because of shifting relationships between economic variables and the voting decision. I use pooled cross-sectional data from the 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1992 American National Election Studies to test the hypothesis that Black, working-class, and unemployed individuals who stayed home from the polls in 1980 and 1988 became mobilized during the 1984 and 1992 presidential elections because of the nature of the economy and the party of the incumbent president. I extend this analysis to include athtudinal variables that measure perceptions about the state of the national economy and the effect of national policies on one's personal financial well-being. The results of the probit analyses suggest that (a) working-class individuals were less likely to vote in the 1980 and 1988 elections, but this variation vanished in 1984 and 1992, and (b) both "pocketbook" and "sociotropic" concern regarding unemployment led to increased participation in the 1984 and 1992 elections, in contrast to the 1980 and 1988 elections.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?