American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sulfaro, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 303-337 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9602400302

The Role of Ideology and Political Sophistication in the Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes

Valerie A. Sulfaro

James Madison University

Public opinion researchers have long believed that Americans' attitudes on foreign policy issues fail to demonstrate the level of structure and stability that is present in attitudes on domestic issues. Several recent studies have challenged this view, claiming that mass orientations toward foreign policy are coherent and rational but are structured differently than attitudes on other issues. Using data from the 1984 and 1988 American National Election Studies, I find that some members of the public evaluate foreign policy issues using the same ideological yardsticks as they do for domestic issues, while others exhibit less structured evaluations of both issue areas I conclude that arguments suggesting that foreign policy attitudes have a unique organizational structure are unnecessarily complex. A more parsimonious model provides a similar degree of explanatory power and accounts for foreign and domestic policy attitudes equally well.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?