This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, E. G. Articles by Weisert, T. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Context and the Court

Sources of Support for Civil Liberties on the Rehnquist Court

Vanderbilt University

Frances U. Sandstrum

Vanderbilt University

Thomas C. Weisert

Vanderbilt University

The Rehnquist Court is a conservative court. A number of scholars, however, have found a surprisingly stable level of support for liberal outcomes in civil liberties cases despite important changes in membership that should have made the Court even more conservative. We offer an explanation for this stability based on changes in the Court's context as measured by the direction of lower court decisions reviewed by the Supreme Court. The relative liberalism of the Rehnquist Court is explained by its reversals of conservative lower court decisions, reversals that have constituted a larger proportion of the Court's decisions in recent years. These findings present a more complex and accurate picture of the conservatism of the Rehnquist Court.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?