American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gormley, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 174-195 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9802600203

Witnesses for the Revolution

William T. Gormley, JR

Georgetown University

The Republican Revolution reshaped many congressional practices, including the mix of interest groups testifying before House committees, in ways that promote partisan responsiveness. A comparison of the 104th and 103rd Congresses reveals significantly more testimony in 1995 by groups sympathetic to the Revolution, less testimony by other groups. Comparisons of individual committees, although more ambiguous, also reveal differences between traditionally partisan and traditionally bipartisan committees.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?