This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by HERRICK, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Who Will Survive?

An Exploration of Factors Contributing to the Removal of Unethical House Members

Oklahoma State University

Some congressional observers fear that unethical members are too insulated from electoral defeat. To estimate the security of unethical members, this article examines the survivability of members who have been accused of unethical behavior since 1977. Although most members who have been accused can survive one election cycle, most are unable to survive two election cycles. As a way of evaluating the ethics process, this article examines which members leave. If the current system removes unethical members, then members who have been found guilty of severe offenses should be more apt to leave than others. The severity of members' offenses did affect their ability to survive, but only significantly so in the long term. The findings show that electoral security plays the dominant role in members' survivability. Other factors affecting which members leave include institutional power, media coverage, the nature of the times, and a member's age.

American Politics Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 96-109 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X00028001006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?