American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VOSS, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by LUBLIN, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 141-182 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029002002

Black Incumbents, White Districts

An Appraisal of the 1996 Congressional Elections

D. STEPHEN VOSS

University of Kentucky dsvoss{at}pop.uky.edu

DAVID LUBLIN

American University dlublin{at}american.edu

This article explores the controversial 1996 success of three African American incumbents (Sanford Bishop and Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and Corrine Brown of Florida) who lost their majority-Black southern congressional districts to Supreme Court decisions. Using aggregate electoral data and Gary King's solution to the ecological inference problem, we gauge (a) the extent of bias against Black candidates, (b) the extent of backlash against Black voters, and (c) the extent to which incumbency explains away the Georgia victories. The findings are compatible with neither a full attack on racial redistricting nor a defense of it. Southern Whites do not exhibit either consistent bias against Black candidates or backlash against Black voters, but racial polarization is nonetheless evident and dispersed in a geographically systematic manner. Barriers against Black representation are still strong, but they are not the electoral barriers that civil rights activists assume when they embrace majority-minority districts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. C. McKee
The Effects of Redistricting on Voting Behavior in Incumbent U.S. House Elections, 1992--1994
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2008; 61(1): 122 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
S. M. Caliendo and C. D. McIlwain
Minority Candidates, Media Framing, and Racial Cues in the 2004 Election
International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2006; 11(4): 45 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]