American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nixon, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goss, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 246-274 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01293002

Confirmation Delay for Vacancies on the Circuit Courts of Appeals

David C. Nixon

Georgia State University

David L. Goss

Georgia State University

Supreme Court confirmation is an exhaustively studied phenomenon, but lower court confirmation is less well understood, in part because lower court nominees are very rarely rejected, and the Senate fails even to hold a recorded vote for most appointees. However, the length of time it takes to fill a judicial vacancy serves as alternate evidence of conflict between the president and the Senate. We present an empirical assessment of appellate vacancy conflict, based on a continuous time-proportional hazard model of vacancy duration. Our results demonstrate that female and minority candidates are confirmed only after unusually long vacancies, and this has nothing to do with the qualifications of the nominees. Our results also demonstrate that institutional and partisan conflict between the Senate and the White House drive the confirmation process for the federal appeals courts, but delay tactics employed by the Senate are only partially strategic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
D. C. Nixon and R. M. Bentley
Appointment Delay and the Policy Environment of the National Transportation Safety Board
Administration Society, January 1, 2006; 37(6): 679 - 694.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
L. A. Solowiej, W. L. Martinek, and T. L. Brunell
Partisan Politics: The Impact of Party in the Confirmation of Minority and Female Federal Court Nominees
Party Politics, September 1, 2005; 11(5): 557 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
T. D. Massie, T. G. Hansford, and D. R. Songer
The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2004; 57(1): 145 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]