American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANGER, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, 392-415 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029004004

The Consequences of State Economic Development Strategies on Income Distribution in the American States, 1976 to 1994

LAURA LANGER

University of Arizona

I ask whether the economic development strategies pursued by state governments to stimulate growth have unintended consequences for the well-being of the citizenry, particularly income distribution. Pooled cross-sectional time-series analysis was employed to empirically evaluate the effects of state economic development strategy on the distribution of income in the American states for the 1976 to 1994 period. Results demonstrate that the economic development strategy state governments take has differential effects on the distribution of income. States that adopt demand-side policies (promoting research and development, technology, and exportation) more than traditional supply-side policies (offering tax abatements and capital subsidies) are associated with more equitable distributions of income. Although the results indicate that states have the power to reduce income inequalities by employing more demand-oriented economic development strategies, the substantive impact is quite small, and the frequency with which states do this is rare when compared to the use of supply-side tactics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
C. Barrilleaux and B. C. Davis
Explaining State-Level Variations In Levels And Change In The Distribution Of Income In The United States, 1978-1990
American Politics Research, May 1, 2003; 31(3): 280 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]