American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shields, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 143-165 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X02030002002

State Campaign Finance Regulations and Electoral Competition

Donald A. Gross

University of Kentucky

Robert K. Goidel

Indiana State University

Todd G. Shields

University of Arkansas

In the following analysis, we provide an assessment of the effect of campaign finance reform on campaign spending and electoral competition in gubernatorial campaigns. The work improves on prior research by considering a longer, more comprehensive time frame (1978-1997) and by examining the effects of several different components of reform (contribution limits, public financing, and spending limits) within a single analytic framework. We find that spending limits reduce candidate spending and have an indirect and negative effect on electoral competition. The negative effects of spending limits, however, are heavily contingent on the level at which the limit is set. Contribution limits are associated with increased disparities in candidate spending and increased incumbent spending but have o direct effects on electoral competition. Overall, whether campaign finance reform enhances or inhibits electoral competition depends very much on the combination of spending limits, contribution limits, and public financing enacted in a give state.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. E. Hamm and R. E. Hogan
Campaign Finance Laws and Candidacy Decisions in State Legislative Elections
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2008; 61(3): 458 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
K. Eom and D. A. Gross
Democratization Effects of Campaign Contribution Limits in Gubernatorial Elections
Party Politics, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 695 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Eom and D. A. Gross
Contribution Limits and Disparity in Contributions between Gubernatorial Candidates
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2006; 59(1): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
P. L. Francia and P. S. Herrnson
The Impact of Public Finance Laws on Fundraising in State Legislative Elections
American Politics Research, September 1, 2003; 31(5): 520 - 539.
[Abstract] [PDF]