American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, A. O M.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 301-325 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X03251381

Power Shift

Measuring Policy Centralization in U.S. Intergovernmental Relations, 1947-1998

Ann O’ M. Bowman, ,

George A. Krause, ,

University of South Carolina

Much extant research on the distribution of power in the American federal system is drawn from qualitative case studies of particular acts of government. This often limits the empirical testing of generalizable hypotheses. To address this shortcoming, we develop an aggregate time series measure of policy centralization by the U.S. federal government for the 1947-1998 annual period utilizing relevant public laws and executive orders. On a substantive level, the data provide quantitative information regarding the willingness of the national government to delegate policymaking responsibility to state governments. This, in turn, can be used to assess the distribution of powers between governmental levels—a subject that has received little systematic inquiry to date. These measures indicate that although U.S. national government policymaking authority has risen in an overall sense during the postwar period vis-à-vis subnational counterparts, it has not grown monotonically over time. Contrary to existing descriptive accounts, the data also show that neither Nixon nor Reagan’s New Federalism initiatives intended to delegate or decentralize policymaking authority to subnational governments have succeeded in igniting systemic, persistent devolution in American federalism.

Key Words: power • policy • centralization


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PubliusHome page
S. Nicholson-Crotty
National Election Cycles and the Intermittent Political Safeguards of Federalism
Publius, January 24, 2008; (2008) pjn002v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PubliusHome page
C.-L. Cho and D. S. Wright
Perceptions of Federal Aid Impacts on State Agencies: Patterns, Trends, and Variations Across the 20th Century
Publius, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 103 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Econ OrganHome page
G. A. Krause and A. OM. Bowman
Adverse Selection, Political Parties, and Policy Delegation in the American Federal System
J. Law Econ. Organ., October 1, 2005; 21(2): 359 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]