Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Politics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duffin, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Explaining Participation in Congressional Oversight Hearings

Diane L. Duffin

University of Nebraska at Kearney

Scholarship on congressional oversight has documented an increase in the amount of time committees have devoted to oversight hearings since the post-1970s reform period that decentralized power in the House. Unknown thus far, though, is the extent to which members avail themselves of their opportunities to use hearings to monitor executive branch activities or what concerns might motivate such participation. Building on prior research on participation in other congressional activities, this study measures participation by House members in reauthorization and appropriations hearings for programs administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development from 1978 to 1986. On the whole, participation in the hearings by rank-and-file committee members was low, but factors such as district and party interests, the timing of the hearings on the electoral cycle, and the presence of the department secretary at the witness table all served to increase participation.

Key Words: oversight • congressional participation • community development • housing and urban development • urban development action grant

American Politics Research, Vol. 31, No. 5, 455-484 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X03252533


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?