American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, 119-141 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X03259939

The Prospects-Based Dynamics of the House Candidacy Decision

David W. Romero

The University of Texas at San Antonio

Strategic politicians thesis studies examine the candidacy phenomenon in general and primary elections, typically testing the influence electoral prospects have on the candidacy decision (indirectly in general elections, directly in primary elections). However, because the candidacy phenomena are different in the two arenas, they offer varying opportunities for theory development. Primary elections, where the phenomena are candidacy decisions, offer the richer laboratory for theory development. Here, I examine primary elections to the House of Representatives and develop a general theoretical framework of the influence electoral prospects have on the candidacy decisions of electively experienced and electively inexperienced candidates. I find that although improving electoral prospects encourage strong and weak candidates to enter primaries, the anticipated increase in primary competition discourages their entry, with weak candidates facing the more severe crowd-out pressures. Observation of district-level candidacy patterns in open-seat and incumbent-challenge primaries confirm my theoretical framework.

Key Words: strategic politicians • divisive primaries • candidacy decision • primary elections


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
A. J. Taylor and R. G. Boatright
The Personal and the Political in Repeat Congressional Candidacies
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2005; 58(4): 599 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]