Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Politics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brians, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Women for Women?

Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates

Craig Leonard Brians

Virginia Tech

In recent years, popular commentators have suggested that the Republican party could narrow the gender gap by nominating women candidates. This proposition assumes that (at least some) women voters’ partisan identification may be trumped by an affinity with their gender. I evaluate the claim that women voters are often induced to cross party lines on election day to support a woman candidate. Analyzing more than a decade of men’s and women’s voting behavior when male and female candidates face one another, I offer evidence that female candidates gain marginally greater support from their own gender. In a relationship not present with other male or female candidates, Democratic women candidates who face GOP men strongly benefit from Republican women voters’ crossover support.

Key Words: gendered voting • Congressional elections • women candidates

American Politics Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 357-375 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X04269415


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Sanbonmatsu and K. Dolan
Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2009; 62(3): 485 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Dolan
Is There a "Gender Affinity Effect" in American Politics?: Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Elections
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2008; 61(1): 79 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
K. Dolan
Symbolic Mobilization?: The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections
American Politics Research, November 1, 2006; 34(6): 687 - 704.
[Abstract] [PDF]