This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heaney, M. T. Articles by Rojas, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Partisans, Nonpartisans, and the Antiwar Movement in the United States

University of Florida

Fabio Rojas

Indiana University, Bloomington

American social movements are often bitterly divided about whether their objectives are achieved better by working with one of the major political parties or by operating independently. These divisions are consequential for how social movements and political parties respond to one another. First, differing partisan attitudes shape the structure of activist networks, leading activists to join organizations with others who share their party loyalties or disloyalties. Second, partisan attitudes affect how activists participate in the movement, with strong partisans more likely to embrace institutional tactics, such as lobbying. Third, partisanship affects activists' access to the institutions of government, such as Congress. Relying on surveys of antiwar activists attending large-scale public demonstrations in 2004 and 2005 and a Capitol Hill Lobby Day in September 2005, the authors argue that some activists integrate into major party networks through the "party in the street," an arena of significant party-movement interaction.

Key Words: antiwar movement • social movements • political parties • party in the street • party identification • activist networks • social networks

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?