| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The Legislative Politics of Congressional Redistricting Commission ProposalsUniversity of Texas at Austin
The Ohio State University
University of Texas at Austin Many politicians and reformers have suggested that allowing non- or bipartisan redistricting commissions to draw congressional districts will make elections more competitive and reduce partisan polarization. Although such commissions reduce the power of political parties and elected officials, they have been considered in 24 states from 1999 to 2006. We combine an analysis of national patterns of bill consideration with an intensive examination of legislative activity in three states. Our study suggests that internal pressures, such as redistricting controversies, and external pressures, such as the initiative process, contribute to the consideration of redistricting commission legislation. Furthermore, the precise combination of internal and external pressures in a state leads proposals to take one of two paths in the legislative process: a "partisan path" dominated by legislative insiders and interparty wrangling and a "good government path" where outside interest groups exercise more influence and the debate surrounds specific features of the proposal.
Key Words: congressional redistricting • gerrymandering • state legislatures • redistricting commissions • state politics • initiatives • interest groups
American Politics Research, Vol. 35, No. 6,
808-825 (2007) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
