This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1532673X07307969v1 36/2/264    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McCall, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Structuring Gender's Impact

Judicial Voting Across Criminal Justice Cases

San Diego State University, California

The importance of judge gender as a factor in judicial votes continues to attract much scholarly attention. I contribute to the debate on the influence of judge gender by examining the voting behavior of male and female state supreme court justices in three areas of criminal justice. I find that female justices, controlling for institutional, political, and legal constraints, are more likely than are their male counterparts to rule for the criminal defendant and in a broader array of cases than commonly thought. I conclude that judge gender is a significant factor in the outcome of judicial decisions and that the number of women on the courts is a factor in judicial decision making.

Key Words: U.S. Court of Appeals • judicial decisions • gender • Fourth Amendment • search and seizure • judicial ideology • attitudinal model

This version was published on March 1, 2008

American Politics Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, 264-296 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X07307969


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?