This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1532673X07313736v1 36/3/335    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hetling, A. Articles by Mapps, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Symbolism Versus Policy Learning

Public Opinion of the 1996 U.S. Welfare Reforms

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick

Monika L. McDermott

University of Connecticut, Storrs

Mingus Mapps

Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts

The logic of democracy rests on the assumption that policymakers respond to public preferences, which, in turn, respond to policy developments. We address the question of how policy might affect public opinion by analyzing public opinion before and after the 1996 U.S. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. We hypothesized that changes made by the legislation would have improved opinions of welfare recipients. Using U.S. surveys from 1994 and 2001, we find that public opinion was more positive postreform and that the change was because of the enactment of welfare reform itself, not any perceived program success.

Key Words: public opinion • public policy • welfare policy • welfare reform • symbolic politics • political learning

This version was published on May 1, 2008

American Politics Research, Vol. 36, No. 3, 335-357 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X07313736


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?