This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1532673X08317767v1 36/6/824    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Althaus, S. L. Articles by Trautman, T. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Impact of Television Market Size on Voter Turnout in American Elections

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Todd C. Trautman

Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado

The turnout literature has identified individual, social, and institutional factors that increase citizen voting. Our article shows that local television market size also affects turnout. Larger television markets tend to give disproportionate attention to higher-level races involving statewide or national offices. Because voters in larger markets should be exposed to less information about the lower-ticket races in which they are eligible to vote, we expect market size to affect levels of turnout. This article tests market size impact using a novel combination of aggregate turnout data for local voting areas, census data giving contextual information about these areas, and data detailing the boundaries of local television media markets. Using the Record of American Democracy data set, our aggregate-level analysis covers four election cycles (1986 to 1990) and nearly every county in the continental United States. Our analysis shows that voter turnout is negatively associated with television market size, a relationship that is stronger in midterm election years.

Key Words: voter turnout • media markets • market size • political communication • designated market areas (DMAs)

This version was published on November 1, 2008

American Politics Research, Vol. 36, No. 6, 824-856 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X08317767


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Rigdon, S. H. Jacobson, W. K. Tam Cho, E. C. Sewell, and C. J. Rigdon A Bayesian Prediction Model for the U.S. Presidential Election American Politics Research, July 1, 2009; 37(4): 700 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF]