Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Politics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1532673X08320844v1
37/2/254    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by García Bedolla, L.
Right arrow Articles by Michelson, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Do Voters Need to Know?

Testing the Role of Cognitive Information in Asian American Voter Mobilization

Lisa García Bedolla

University of California, Berkeley, lisa.garciabedolla{at}gmail.com

Melissa R. Michelson

California State University, East Bay

Previous field experiments have found that indirect methods, particularly direct mail, are not effective in increasing voter turnout. Most of the mail used in these experiments provided procedural information regarding voting and a message encouraging the voter to turn out. Yet, in his review of efforts to increase voting, Berinsky (2005) concluded that it was the cognitive costs of voting—the effort needed to formulate political opinions—that constituted the greatest barrier to voter turnout. This suggests it may be important to consider the type of information being provided when examining direct mail efforts. To test this proposition, we present evidence from field experiments conducted by two Asian-American—serving community organizations during the June and November 2006 elections. We find that the type of information provided does not increase direct mail's effectiveness. Yet unlike previous experiments, we find that phonebanking does have a statistically significant, positive effect on Asian American voter turnout.

Key Words: Asian Americans • voter mobilization • voter turnout • field experiments • information • political participation

This version was published on March 1, 2009

American Politics Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, 254-274 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X08320844


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?