American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roper, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 221-236 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X8000800205

The Determinants of Legislators' Support for Judicial Reorganization

Joel A. Thompson

Appalachian State University

Robert T. Roper

Southern Illinois University

This article attempts to extend the concept of support into anarea that to date has received little attention—support for change in one institution by members of another. Specifi cally, we try to identify the determinants of support in the Kentucky legislature for structural reform of the state's judicial system. We suggest that legislators' expectations concerning impact of the proposed changes on both the administration of justice and local autonomy, as well as other variables like constituency opinion, urbanization, and occupation, affect legislative support for judicial reform. In testing the support model, we find that one institution's support for change in another institution is not only a function of the performance of the institution being evaluated (judiciary), but also results from certain political concerns of the evaluating institution (legislature) that have nothing to do with the merits of the actual reform.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?