|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Beyond Policy Representation in the U.S. HousePartisanship, Polarization, and Citizens' Attitudes About Casework
Michael W. Wagner
University of Delaware
Although a great deal of work shows that House members generally effectively represent the policy preferences of the majority of voters in their district, we know less about a more general level of representation enjoyed by those who do not support the incumbent. This problem is conceptualized by examining whether citizens, especially those in the opposing constituency, view casework as a partisan enterprise. Using data from the American National Election Study (ANES) cumulative file, this alternate way to consider representation illustrates that members of the opposing constituency are less satisfied with casework and less likely to think their representative would be helpful if contacted. Additionally, negative attitudes about casework generally increase in size for all citizens as the parties become increasingly polarized at the elite level and as one's individual representative becomes more extreme. Implications regarding the importance of political parties in the representation process are discussed.
Key Words: representation • casework • U.S. House of Representatives • partisanship • polarization • political participation
References
- Cain, B.E., Ferejohn, J.A., & Fiorina, M.P. (1984). The constituency service basis of personal vote for U.S. representatives and British members of Parliament. American Political Science Review, 78, 110-125.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Cox, G.W., & McCubbins, M.D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics, 48, 370-389.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Erikson, R.S., MacKuen, M.B., & Stimson, J.A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Erikson, R.S., & Wright, G.C. (2000). Representation of constituency ideology in Congress. In D. W. Brady, J. F. Cogan, & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Continuity and change in house elections (pp. 148-177). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Erikson, R.S., & Wright, G.C. (2001). Voters, candidates, and issues in congressional elections. In L. C. Dodd & B. I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (7th ed., pp. 67-96). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Erikson, R.S., Wright, G.C., & McIver, J.P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Eulau, H., & Karps, P. (1977). The puzzle of representation: Specifying components of responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2, 233-254.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Fenno, R.F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Fiorina, M.P. (1974). Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
- Fiorina, M.P. (1977). Congress: Keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Fiorina, M.P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A microanalysis. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 426-443.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Some problems in studying the effects of resources allocation in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 543-567.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Fiorina, M.P. (1999). A dark side of civic engagement. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 395-425). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Fiorina, M.P., Abrams, S.J., & Pope, J.C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
- Hetherington, M.J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of political elites. American Political Science Review, 95, 619-632.[Web of Science]
- Hibbing, J., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Johannes, J.R. (1983). Explaining congressional casework styles. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 530-547.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Johannes, J.R., & McAdams, J.C. (1981). The congressional incumbency effect: Is it casework, policy compatibility, or something else? An examination of the 1978 election. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 512-542.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Mann, T.E., & Wolfinger, R.E. (1980). Candidates and parties in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 74, 617-632.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Meirowitz, A., & Tucker, J.A. (2007). Run Boris run: Strategic voting and information transmission in sequential elections. Journal of Politics, 69, 88-99.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Ortiz, L.P., Wirz, C., Semion, K., & Rodriguez, C.D. (2004). Legislative casework: Where policy practice intersect. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 31(2), 49-68.
- Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll-call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Serra, G., & Moon, D. (1994). Casework, issue positions, and voting in congressional elections: A district analysis. Journal of Politics, 56, 200-213.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Yiannakis, D.E. (1981). The grateful electorate: Casework and congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 568-580.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
This version was published on November
1, 2007
American Politics Research, Vol. 35, No. 6,
771-789 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X07299867
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
