|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Legislative Politics of Congressional Redistricting Commission Proposals
Andrew Karch
University of Texas at Austin
Corrine M. McConnaughy
The Ohio State University
Sean M. Theriault
University of Texas at Austin
Many politicians and reformers have suggested that allowing non- or bipartisan redistricting commissions to draw congressional districts will make elections more competitive and reduce partisan polarization. Although such commissions reduce the power of political parties and elected officials, they have been considered in 24 states from 1999 to 2006. We combine an analysis of national patterns of bill consideration with an intensive examination of legislative activity in three states. Our study suggests that internal pressures, such as redistricting controversies, and external pressures, such as the initiative process, contribute to the consideration of redistricting commission legislation. Furthermore, the precise combination of internal and external pressures in a state leads proposals to take one of two paths in the legislative process: a "partisan path" dominated by legislative insiders and interparty wrangling and a "good government path" where outside interest groups exercise more influence and the debate surrounds specific features of the proposal.
Key Words: congressional redistricting • gerrymandering • state legislatures • redistricting commissions • state politics • initiatives • interest groups
References
- Berry, F.S., & Berry, W.D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395-415.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Binder, S. (2003). Stalemate: Causes and consequences of legislative gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2004). The initiative process. In V. Gray & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (8th ed., pp. 129-156). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Bowler, S., Donovan, T., Neiman, M., & Peel, J. (2001). Institutional threat and partisan outcomes: Legislative candidates' attitudes toward direct democracy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 364-379.
- Brazatis, T. (2000, September 3). Not much of a race at all. Cleveland Plain Dealer, 21.
- Congressional Quarterly. (2000). Politics in America. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Congressional Quarterly. (2002). Politics in America. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Council of State Governments. (2000). Book of the states. Lexington, KY: Author.
- Gerber, E.R. (1996). Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 99-128.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174-1185.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Haider-Markel, D.P. (2001). Policy diffusion as a geographical expansion of the scope of political conflict. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 5-26.
- Hall, R.L. (1996). Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
- Mayhew, D.R. (1991). Divided we govern: Party control, lawmaking, and investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- McConnaughy, C.M. (2004). The politics of suffrage extension in the American states: Party, race, and the pursuit of women's voting rights. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
- Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738-770.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- National Conference of State Legislatures. ( 2005, October). States with statewide redistricting litigation in the post-2000 cycle. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/redistrict/hebert1/img025.gif
- Skocpol, T. (1999). Advocates without members: The recent transformation of American civic life. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 461-509). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Theriault, S.M. (2005). The power of the people: Congressional competition, public attention, and voter retribution. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
- Vogel, N. (2005, January 15). Bill would cast judges as political cartographers. Los Angeles Times, B6.
- Walker, J.L., Jr. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880-899.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Wilkins, H. (2006, January). League in the spotlight submitted by the LWV of Indiana. Retrieved June 23, 2006, from http://www.lwv.org
- Yi, M., & Lucas, G. (2006, August 18). State redistricting proposal succumbs in legislative limbo. San Francisco Chronicle, B6.
American Politics Research, Vol. 35, No. 6,
808-825 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X07303627
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
