|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Dimensions of Negative Messages
Kim L. Fridkin*
and
Patrick J. Kenney
Arizona State University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Fridkin{at}asu.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Candidates and campaign strategists believe that negative campaigning works—negative messages depress citizen’s evaluations of targeted candidates. However, scholars have been unable to validate consistently the claims of practitioners. To better understand how negative campaigning influences the electorate, it is necessary to consider the relevance and civility of negative messages. In particular, do citizens make distinctions concerning the relevance and civility of campaign messages? If so, do citizens’ views about the relevance and civility of negative messages influence how they evaluate candidates? We rely on an experimental research design embedded in a public opinion survey to examine people’s reactions to negative commercials. Based on a national survey of nearly 700 respondents, we find citizens differentiate between negative advertisements in meaningful and consistent ways. Furthermore, the civility and relevance of the negative commercials significantly influences people’s evaluations of the targeted candidates in several ways, including trait, affect, and issue evaluations.
First published on April 4, 2008, doi:10.1177/1532673X08316448
American Politics Research 2008;36:694.
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
