This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1532673X08319953v1 37/1/129    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fogarty, B. J. Articles by Wolak, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Media Interpretation for Citizen Evaluations of Politicians' Messages

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wolakj{at}colorado.edu.

	Abstract

Although politicians prefer to communicate directly with the public, political sound bites in the nightly news are shrinking and primetime presidential press conferences are becoming increasingly uncommon. Instead, people primarily receive the messages of politicians as interpreted by journalists. What are the consequences of this interpretation for how citizens evaluate political messages? This article compares how people evaluate mediated political accounts and those delivered by politicians directly. Using a set of experiments, this article considers whether the power of politicians to inform and persuade people is limited or enhanced through the interpretation of journalists. This article finds that although people respond similarly to message content, whether from the politicians or from the media, evaluations of the message source and political processes are improved when politicians communicate directly with the public.

First published on July 2, 2008, doi:10.1177/1532673X08319953

American Politics Research 2009;37:129.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?