American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, V.
Right arrow Articles by LOWERY, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, 374-391 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029004003
© 2001 SAGE Publications

The Expression of Density Dependence in State Communities of Organized Interests

VIRGINIA GRAY

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

DAVID LOWERY

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

We examine a key issue arising from the density dependence hypothesis of the population ecology approach to studying interest communities: the expression of density dependence through variations in the rates of entrance and/or exit from lobbying communities. How such expression occurs will influence (a) the independence of mobilization phenomena from the nature of the lobbying community into which an organization is being mobilized and (b) the prospects of demographic turnover within interest communities. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analyses of new and more complete data using a more fully specified model generates sharply different results from those reported by Gray and Lowery, suggesting that much greater attention must be accorded to community context in analyses of the mobilization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
V. Gray, D. Lowery, M. Fellowes, and J. L. Anderson
Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy: Understanding the Demand Side of Lobbying
American Politics Research, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 404 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
D. Lowery, V. Gray, and M. Fellowes
Sisyphus Meets the Borg: Economic Scale and Inequalities in Interest Representation
Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 2005; 17(1): 41 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
D. Lowery and V. Gray
A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2004; 57(1): 164 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
D. Lowery and V. Gray
Bias in the Heavenly Chorus: Interests in Society and before Government
Journal of Theoretical Politics, January 1, 2004; 16(1): 5 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]