This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by TOLBERT, C. J. Articles by SMITH, D. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the American States

Kent State University

JOHN A. GRUMMEL

Kent State University

DANIEL A. SMITH

University of Denver

With few exceptions, voter turnout continues to decline in the United States. Although normative theorists, journalists, and defenders of participatory democracy frequently suggest that citizen-initiated ballot measures can increase voter turnout, previous research has not supported this claim. Yet, in the past 25 years, usage of direct democracy has exploded in the United States. Using pooled time series data for the 50 states over a 26-year period (1970-1996), we find that the presence and usage of the initiative process is associated with higher voter turnout in both presidential and midterm elections. The disparity in turnout rates between initiative and noninitiative states has been increasing over time, estimated at 7% to 9% higher in midterm and 3% to 4.5% higher in presidential elections in the 1990s. Our analysis suggests that the initiative process can and does play a positive role in increasing electoral participation.

American Politics Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, 625-648 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029006005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Donovan, C. J. Tolbert, and D. A. Smith Political Engagement, Mobilization, and Direct Democracy Public Opin Q, April 2, 2009; (2009) nfp017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Becker and D. A. Scheufele Moral Politicking: Public Attitudes toward Gay Marriage in an Election Context International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2009; 14(2): 186 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Campbell and J. Q. Monson The Religion Card: Gay Marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election Public Opin Q, September 2, 2008; (2008) nfn032v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Bali and B. C. Davis One More Piece to Make Us Puzzle: The Initiative Process and Legislators' Reelection Chances Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 60(2): 215 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Z. Bambauer State Mental Health Policy: Proposition 63: Should Other States Follow California's Lead? Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2005; 56(6): 642 - 644. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Tolbert and D. A. Smith The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout American Politics Research, March 1, 2005; 33(2): 283 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Tolbert and R. S. Mcneal Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2003; 56(2): 175 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Smith and C. J. Tolbert The Initiative to Party: Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California Party Politics, November 1, 2001; 7(6): 739 - 757. [Abstract] [PDF]