American Politics Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TOLBERT, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Politics Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, 625-648 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01029006005
© 2001 SAGE Publications

The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the American States

CAROLINE J. TOLBERT

Kent State University

JOHN A. GRUMMEL

Kent State University

DANIEL A. SMITH

University of Denver

With few exceptions, voter turnout continues to decline in the United States. Although normative theorists, journalists, and defenders of participatory democracy frequently suggest that citizen-initiated ballot measures can increase voter turnout, previous research has not supported this claim. Yet, in the past 25 years, usage of direct democracy has exploded in the United States. Using pooled time series data for the 50 states over a 26-year period (1970-1996), we find that the presence and usage of the initiative process is associated with higher voter turnout in both presidential and midterm elections. The disparity in turnout rates between initiative and noninitiative states has been increasing over time, estimated at 7% to 9% higher in midterm and 3% to 4.5% higher in presidential elections in the 1990s. Our analysis suggests that the initiative process can and does play a positive role in increasing electoral participation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
V. A. Bali and B. C. Davis
One More Piece to Make Us Puzzle: The Initiative Process and Legislators' Reelection Chances
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 60(2): 215 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
K. Z. Bambauer
State Mental Health Policy: Proposition 63: Should Other States Follow California's Lead?
Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2005; 56(6): 642 - 644.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
C. J. Tolbert and D. A. Smith
The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout
American Politics Research, March 1, 2005; 33(2): 283 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. J. Tolbert and R. S. Mcneal
Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation?
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2003; 56(2): 175 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Party PoliticsHome page
D. A. Smith and C. J. Tolbert
The Initiative to Party: Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California
Party Politics, November 1, 2001; 7(6): 739 - 757.
[Abstract] [PDF]