This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tolbert, C. J. Articles by Smith, D. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Educative Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout

Kent State University

Daniel A. Smith

University of Florida

Scholars have begun examining what Progressive reformers called the educative effects of direct democracy, especially the effect ballot initiatives have on voter turnout. Research based on aggregate-level voter age population (VAP) turnout data indicates that ballot measures increase turnout in low-information midterm elections but not in presidential elections. We analyze the impact of ballot initiative use on voter turnout from 1980 through 2002 using voter eligible population (VEP) turnout rates. Cross-sectional time-series analysis reveals that (a) ballot initiatives increase turnout in midterm as well as presidential elections and (b) the turnout effect in midterm and especially presidential elections is considerably larger than previously thought. On average, turnout in presidential elections increases by 0.70% with each initiative on the ballot, whereas turnout in midterm elections increases by 1.7%, all else equal. Given the closeness of the Electoral College contests, it is possible that the mobilizing effects of statewide ballot questions could be the determining factor in future presidential elections.

Key Words: direct democracy • ballot initiatives • turnout • progressive reform • education • political awareness

American Politics Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, 283-309 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X04271904


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Donovan, C. J. Tolbert, and D. A. Smith Political Engagement, Mobilization, and Direct Democracy Public Opin Q, April 2, 2009; (2009) nfp017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Becker and D. A. Scheufele Moral Politicking: Public Attitudes toward Gay Marriage in an Election Context International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2009; 14(2): 186 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Tolbert, D. C. Bowen, and T. Donovan Initiative Campaigns: Direct Democracy and Voter Mobilization American Politics Research, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 155 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Kimball and M. Kropf Voting Technology, Ballot Measures, and Residual Votes American Politics Research, July 1, 2008; 36(4): 479 - 509. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. A. Bali and B. C. Davis One More Piece to Make Us Puzzle: The Initiative Process and Legislators' Reelection Chances Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 60(2): 215 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF]