Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Politics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Daily Show Effect

Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth

Jody Baumgartner

Jonathan S. Morris

East Carolina University

We test the effects of a popular televised source of political humor for young Americans: The Daily Show With Jon Stewart. We find that participants exposed to jokes about George W. Bush and John Kerry on The Daily Show tended to rate both candidates more negatively, even when controlling for partisanship and other demographic variables. Moreover, we find that viewers exhibit more cynicism toward the electoral system and the news media at large. Despite these negative reactions, viewers of The Daily Show reported increased confidence in their ability to understand the complicated world of politics. Our findings are significant in the burgeoning field of research on the effects of "soft news" on the American public. Although research indicates that soft news contributes to democratic citizenship in America by reaching out to the inattentive public, our findings indicate that The Daily Show may have more detrimental effects, driving down support for political institutions and leaders among those already inclined toward nonparticipation.

Key Words: media and politics • political campaigns • The Daily Show • infotainment • political information • young voters • political socialization

American Politics Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, 341-367 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X05280074
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
Y. Tsfati, R. Tukachinsky, and Y. Peri
Exposure to News, Political Comedy, and Entertainment Talk Shows, Concern about Security and Political Mistrust
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., May 20, 2009; (2009) edp015v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
X. Cao and P. R. Brewer
Political Comedy Shows and Public Participation in Politics
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2008; 20(1): 90 - 99.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JournalismHome page
L. Feldman
The news about comedy: Young audiences, The Daily Show, and evolving notions of journalism
Journalism, August 1, 2007; 8(4): 406 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
J. C. Baumgartner
Humor on the Next Frontier: Youth, Online Political Humor, and the JibJab Effect
Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 319 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]